<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Surface vs. Perspective Pixel&#8217;s Multi-touch (Jeff Han)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dhashi.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface-vs-perspective-pixels-multi-touch-jeff-han/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dhashi.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface-vs-perspective-pixels-multi-touch-jeff-han/</link>
	<description>Using Ubuntu Linux as my primary desktop OS at a University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 06:30:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: solarbus</title>
		<link>http://dhashi.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface-vs-perspective-pixels-multi-touch-jeff-han/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>solarbus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dhashi.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface-vs-perspective-pixels-multi-touch-jeff-han/#comment-330</guid>
		<description>I believe the surface is using perspective pixels screen technology and adding the cameras for surface recognition. Ialso believe the I-phone is using the same touch screen as perspective pixels. It would make business sense to get cash by selling smaller and niche uses for  the two big computer company&#039;s. Then perspective pixels can produce there own version of the technology. Wallpaper. and usable screens for the rest of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the surface is using perspective pixels screen technology and adding the cameras for surface recognition. Ialso believe the I-phone is using the same touch screen as perspective pixels. It would make business sense to get cash by selling smaller and niche uses for  the two big computer company&#8217;s. Then perspective pixels can produce there own version of the technology. Wallpaper. and usable screens for the rest of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhashi</title>
		<link>http://dhashi.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface-vs-perspective-pixels-multi-touch-jeff-han/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>dhashi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dhashi.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface-vs-perspective-pixels-multi-touch-jeff-han/#comment-299</guid>
		<description>I think their solution is different, I&#039;ll have to look into that a little more and get back to you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think their solution is different, I&#8217;ll have to look into that a little more and get back to you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShuB</title>
		<link>http://dhashi.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface-vs-perspective-pixels-multi-touch-jeff-han/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>ShuB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dhashi.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface-vs-perspective-pixels-multi-touch-jeff-han/#comment-298</guid>
		<description>I thought Microsoft is using Perspective Pixels Technology for MS Surface... right?

- ShuB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Microsoft is using Perspective Pixels Technology for MS Surface&#8230; right?</p>
<p>- ShuB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhashi</title>
		<link>http://dhashi.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface-vs-perspective-pixels-multi-touch-jeff-han/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>dhashi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dhashi.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface-vs-perspective-pixels-multi-touch-jeff-han/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Hi jmdz,

In Jeff Han&#039;s presentation, he hinted that the technology will be available within a years time at some level. Considering the recent news about a very visual interface the new Apple OS is going to have, might make you start to wonder if they&#039;ll be the first to have a multi-touch laptop, or WideScreen LCD replace for their desktop. Though I shiver at the thought of having to buy a lot of screen wipes :P

-dhashi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi jmdz,</p>
<p>In Jeff Han&#8217;s presentation, he hinted that the technology will be available within a years time at some level. Considering the recent news about a very visual interface the new Apple OS is going to have, might make you start to wonder if they&#8217;ll be the first to have a multi-touch laptop, or WideScreen LCD replace for their desktop. Though I shiver at the thought of having to buy a lot of screen wipes <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-dhashi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmdz</title>
		<link>http://dhashi.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface-vs-perspective-pixels-multi-touch-jeff-han/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>jmdz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dhashi.wordpress.com/2007/05/30/microsoft-surface-vs-perspective-pixels-multi-touch-jeff-han/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I really do think that this technology is from the 80&#039;s up until now where Corporation such as MS., and others are influential on the current market (so it is market feasible due to huge influence of MS on the market)., but i like Mr. Hans presentation., better than ahemm.. Mr. Gates., but to think about this technology it is more usefull than the mouse back at Xerox Laboratories (80&#039;s). One thing if this technology sells in about 5-10 yrs, I don&#039;t want to really think about it, cause it might replace all the common desktop peripherals / IO devices into this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really do think that this technology is from the 80&#8217;s up until now where Corporation such as MS., and others are influential on the current market (so it is market feasible due to huge influence of MS on the market)., but i like Mr. Hans presentation., better than ahemm.. Mr. Gates., but to think about this technology it is more usefull than the mouse back at Xerox Laboratories (80&#8217;s). One thing if this technology sells in about 5-10 yrs, I don&#8217;t want to really think about it, cause it might replace all the common desktop peripherals / IO devices into this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
